|
|
Routing WG: Explicit Routing (ER)
Some members and gigaPoPs have described needs for routing behavior more
sophisticated than the current technique of forwarding to a next-hop router
based on destination IP address. The capability of making forwarding
decisions incorporating source information e.g., source IP
address, input interface on a router or switch, or a
label/tag in the packet is a requirement of any solution to this
problem. The solution must also address the "fish
problem" (need a reference): there must be a mechanism for a packet to
traverse a router en route to an egress port
on another router, even when this router has a "better" route to the
destination. For example, the site originating the
packet may be disallowed by policy from transiting a network which would
offer a "better" path (i.e., fewer hops, greater bandwidth,
lower latency, etc.).
Several router manufacturers are developing technologies that may provide
a solution to this problem. The I2rwg
monitors these developments, offers critical and constructive feedback,
and will evaluate and test these technologies
when appropriate. When a suitable solution is available, the I2rwg will
provide deployment advice and assistance, as
desired by backbone, gigaPoP, and site operators.
Milestones
|
Manufacturer status reports at Jan 2001 Jt Techs meeting.
|
28-31 Jan 2001 |
|
Evaluate and test potential solutions.
|
unscheduled
|
|
|